SITCSection 5
U.S. imports of organic compounds, n.e.s. (SITC 51699) totaled $8.7M in April 2026, traded with 25 countries.
Importers of Organic Compounds, N.E.S. paid $373K in duties in April 2026 — an effective duty rate of 5.2% on $7.1M in dutiable value, based on actual customs collections rather than the published tariff schedule. Organic Compounds, N.E.S. imports of $8.7M in April 2026 ran 11% above the year-to-date monthly average of $7.8M.
Last updated: April 2026 dataClassified as a residual catch-all for organic chemical substances not enumerated elsewhere in the schedule, this heading captures a wide range of specialty and intermediate compounds that don't fit neatly into more specific SITC categories. Trade professionals should pay close attention to HTS classification at the 10-digit level, as individual compounds may carry distinct duty rates, Section 301 exposure, or antidumping orders depending on their precise chemical identity. Correct classification often requires a chemical analysis or manufacturer's specification sheet to distinguish these compounds from named substances in adjacent headings.
AI-written summary of the official U.S. Census Bureau trade figures on this page — verify before relying on it.
Classification hinges on whether the compound is explicitly named in a more specific SITC heading. If it is not, it defaults to the N.E.S. residual. A licensed customs broker or chemist familiar with SITC and HTS nomenclature should review the compound's CAS number and chemical structure to confirm correct placement.
Yes. Many organic chemical compounds imported from China are subject to Section 301 tariffs, and the applicability depends on the specific 10-digit HTS subheading rather than the SITC heading alone. Importers should verify each compound's HTS classification and check the relevant Section 301 lists before entry.
Supplier Network
Get discovered by U.S. importers searching for HS 51699 — Organic Compounds, N.E.S.. Be the first supplier listed.
Monthly import values over time